Posted in Code, Humor, Physics, Projects
0 Comments

The snarXiv — Mar 10, 2010

The snarXiv is a ran­dom high-energy the­ory paper gen­er­a­tor incor­po­rat­ing all the lat­est trends, entropic rea­son­ing, and excit­ing mod­uli spaces. The arXiv is sim­i­lar, but occa­sion­ally less random.

Actu­ally, the snarXiv only gen­er­ates tan­ta­liz­ing titles and abstracts at the moment, while the arXiv deliv­ers match­ing papers as well. Details of the imple­men­ta­tion are below. I’m the author, and I don’t remem­ber exactly why I decided to do this. I did already have the frame­work lying around from a pre­vi­ous project, and I swear I spent more time doing research last week­end than imple­ment­ing snarXiv.org.

Sug­gested Uses for the snarXiv

  • If you’re a grad­u­ate stu­dent, gloomily read through the abstracts, think­ing to your­self that you don’t under­stand papers on the real arXiv any better.
  • If you’re a post-doc, reload until you find some­thing to work on.
  • If you’re a pro­fes­sor, get really excited when a paper claims to solve the hier­ar­chy prob­lem, the lit­tle hier­ar­chy prob­lem, the mu prob­lem, and the con­fine­ment prob­lem. Then expe­ri­ence pro­found disappointment.
  • If you’re a famous physi­cist, keep reload­ing until you see your name on some­thing, then claim credit for it.

Con­tinue reading »

Sep 02, 2009 @ 12:14 am
0 Comments

The Kopp-Etchells Effect

Heli­copter blades mov­ing through a dust cloud cre­ate a strik­ing halo:

P17-bottom-a-730

Basi­cally it is a result of sta­tic elec­tric­ity cre­ated by fric­tion as mate­ri­als of dis­sim­i­lar mate­r­ial strike against each other. In this case titanium/nickel blades mov­ing through the air and dust. It occurs on the ground as well, but you don’t usu­ally see it as much unless the air­craft is land­ing or tak­ing off. The most com­mon time is when fuel is being pumped. When large tankers are being fueled they must be grounded to pre­vent sta­tic elec­tric­ity from dis­charg­ing and cre­at­ing explo­sions.

Aug 22, 2009 @ 2:29 am
0 Comments

A Delicious New Solar Cell Technology

This video has the awe­somest com­bi­na­tion of yum­mi­ness and sci­en­tific accu­racy I’ve seen in years. Sci­ence is delicious!

Posted in Awesome, Humor, Nerdiness, Physics
0 Comments

Gravity (One Gallon) — Jun 15, 2009

So I sup­pose all you have to do now is extract a small amount. A quan­tum if you will. Prob­lem solved.

e42d2509c5f24c24ef96a8faad492e0544c1711a_m

Con­tinue reading »

Jun 09, 2009 @ 10:57 pm
0 Comments

Physics and Photoshop Disaster

Wow. Just wow. See if you can guess what’s wrong with this recent post at Pho­to­shop Dis­as­ters

lasenza

Posted in Awesome, Physics
1 Comment

Colliding Particles — May 12, 2009

fr_bg_000

collidingparticles.com has a series of (beau­ti­fully pro­duced) episodes about “Hunt­ing the Higgs” at the LHC.

The episode about the­o­rists is unsur­pris­ingly enti­tled Prob­lems, and fea­tures a num­ber of good moments, from signs at the LHC that read “Risk of Liq­uid Air,” to enor­mous chalk­boards cov­ered with Feyn­man dia­grams, to the hilar­i­ous expres­sions of all-too-familiar grad stu­dent angst (“some­times I almost want to give up everything”).

’Prob­lems’ trav­els to Paris for a look at some of the the­o­ret­i­cal work behind the ‘Eurostar’ paper. Gavin and his PhD stu­dent Math­ieu explore the math­e­mat­ics behind the behav­iour of fun­da­men­tal par­ti­cles, and we have an update on the ‘inci­dent’ which is hold­ing up work at the LHC.

One of my favorite quotes is an obser­va­tion that I didn’t fully under­stand until well into grad­u­ate school:

I think one of the hard­est parts of research is not so much try­ing to solve a prob­lem, as fig­ur­ing out which prob­lem you’re going to solve.

It’s absolutely true. The most excit­ing prob­lems are simul­ta­ne­ously easy enough to be solv­able, and hard enough to teach you some­thing deep while you’re solv­ing them. So far, for me, these have been hard to come by. My impres­sion, based on the work that’s been done by my pro­fes­sors, is that a sense for the right prob­lems is some­thing you develop slowly over time, no mat­ter how clever you are.

And as ridicu­lous and depressed as the poor Ph.D. stu­dent sounds in places, I com­pletely under­stand what he’s feel­ing. The real­iza­tion that the­o­ret­i­cal physics is hard (and I mean real physics, not class­work), is some­thing that comes in waves, and really only starts to hit in grad­u­ate school. It’s a lit­tle scary — you’ve got to grow up fast, or go do some­thing else.

Posted in Cartoon, Humor, Nerdiness, Physics
4 Comments

Useless Physics Cartoon — May 11, 2009

Why the hat? I'm a free meson.

Mar 04, 2009 @ 1:22 am
0 Comments

10 Things You Didn’t Know About the Sun

Phil Plait over at Bad Astron­omy has a great post fea­tur­ing some awe­some facts about everyone’s favorite star. Alright, you prob­a­bly know some of them. But there’s some good stuff in there. A cou­ple of my favorites:

Usu­ally, dam­age to the eyes from look­ing at the Sun hap­pens dur­ing a total solar eclipse. The eclipse itself doesn’t hurt you — after all, the point of the eclipse is that the Sun is cov­ered by the Moon! — but the dam­age hap­pens in the moments right after the eclipse. While the Sun is blocked, your pupil dilates to let in more light, so when the first sliver of the bril­liant Sun reap­pears your eye is flooded with light. This can cause dam­age to your retina called solar retinopa­thy. It’s actu­ally not heat dam­age, but pho­to­chem­i­cal; the flood of UV light actu­ally alters the chem­istry of your cells, dam­ag­ing them.

In gen­eral, the dam­age is minor and can heal well, though there can be some per­ma­nent though rel­a­tively minor effects (in other words, you still shouldn’t stare at the Sun). Usu­ally the dam­age is worse in chil­dren because their lenses let in more blue light (the lens yel­lows with age, act­ing as a nat­ural fil­ter for UV light). […]

Inci­den­tally, using sun­glasses to look at the Sun can actu­ally make things worse, since they block vis­i­ble light and your pupil dilates to com­pen­sate. If you want to observe the Sun — and I rec­om­mend it, because it’s fas­ci­nat­ing and utterly beau­ti­ful — then read Mr Eclipse’s guide to safe solar view­ing. It’s a site for sore eyes.

The Sun is not an aver­age star […] As with most things in nature, the num­ber of objects depends on the size. There are very few high mass stars, more inter­me­di­ate mass stars, and gazil­lions of low mass stars. Roughly 10% of all stars by num­ber in the Milky Way Galaxy are like the Sun, which means that very few are more mas­sive. Even being con­ser­v­a­tive, I’d say that the Sun is more mas­sive than 80% of the stars in the Galaxy.

Feb 26, 2009 @ 2:54 am
0 Comments

Illuminating Analogy

As I sus­pect most high energy physi­cists do, I stay acutely aware of what’s hap­pen­ing on Lubos Motl’s blog. Today, he offered a par­tic­u­larly illu­mi­nat­ing anal­ogy describ­ing our rela­tion­ship to some cur­rent phys­i­cal theories

So we are some­what sim­i­lar to a prim­i­tive tribe that finds a wash­ing machine (pro­duced by some­one else). At the begin­ning, they will use it as a fridge. As their knowl­edge increases, they will learn how to do the laun­dry. How­ever, if they become even more skill­ful, they may update the device a bit — or press a hid­den but­ton — and use it as a fridge, too. I didn’t tell you: it was one of the wash­ing machines that can also cool the clothes down.

Posted in Humor, Music, Physics
25 Comments

Honda Needs a Tune-Up — Dec 23, 2008

This is the story of how Honda engi­neers screwed up a big expen­sive project with a sim­ple arith­metic mis­take, tried to fudge their result with sound edit­ing soft­ware, and con­grat­u­lated them­selves for being totally awesome.

When I was a kid, my fam­ily used to drive up to The Pin­ery in Ontario, a beau­ti­ful park by Lake Huron. Very scenic. My favorite part, though, was a stretch of road a half-hour out­side of the park. To dis­cour­age reck­less Cana­di­ans from bar­rel­ing past the houses and barns, the local gov­ern­ment carved five sets of grooves in the road before every stop sign. Drive over them, and the car would vibrate: “vbvb­vbvb… vbvb­vbvb… vbvb­vbvb… vbvb­vbvb… vbvb­vbvb.” The faster you drive, the higher the pitch.

My Dad is a musi­col­o­gist, with a par­tic­u­lar inter­est in tun­ing. So there was no way he was going to pass up the chance to exper­i­ment with this instru­ment. Every time we approached some grooves, he’d start fast over the first set, and try to slow down by the last set, to play a descend­ing scale: G-F-E-D-C. If there was no oncom­ing traf­fic after the stop sign, he’d swing over to the other side of the road and play an ascend­ing scale as we sped up. Con­tinue reading »