<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colliding Particles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidsd.org/2009/05/colliding-particles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidsd.org/2009/05/colliding-particles/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:25:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://davidsd.org/2009/05/colliding-particles/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidsd.org/?p=1488#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I agree that the quote is true, but disagree that it is profound or something one doesn&#039;t fully understand prior to grad school.  The idea that theoretical physics (or research more generally) is a wave is better, but to really convince me of this you&#039;d have to show me that it interferes with other wavelike phenomena like exercise or spelunking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the quote is true, but disagree that it is profound or something one doesn’t fully understand prior to grad school.  The idea that theoretical physics (or research more generally) is a wave is better, but to really convince me of this you’d have to show me that it interferes with other wavelike phenomena like exercise or spelunking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
